2018 - 2019 Academic Year

The workshop will meet on Fridays 3:30-5:00pm in Room 707 International Affairs Building, except where otherwise noted below.

Date
(Schedule Change)
Topic Presenter
28 Sep 2018
(3:30pm, IAB 1201)
Formal Models and Lab Experiments Giovanna Invernizzi
05 Oct 2018 Intro to Python Jeff Jacobs
19 Oct 2018 Web Scraping in R Erin York
2 Nov 2018 Working with Interview Data Colleen Wood
9 Nov 2018 Introduction to GIS in R - Volume 1 Merlin Noël Heidemanns
30 Nov 2018
(3:30pm, IAB 1201)
RDDs: Theory and Practice Pablo Argonte
8 Feb 2019 Sentiment Analysis Jeff Jacobs
22 Feb 2019 Bayesian Process Tracing Theo Milonopoulos
1 Mar 2019 Regular Expressions Julian Gerez
8 Mar 2019 Conceptualizing Democracy Charles Battaglini
15 Mar 2019 The BIQQ Framework Simone Paci
5 Apr 2019 SurveyCTO Dylan Groves
24 Apr 2019 Introduction to GIS in R - Volume 2 Merlin Noël Heidemanns
3 May 2019 Design, Implementation and Analysis of Conjoint experiments Anja Kilibarda and Julia Rubio

Workshop Materials

List Experiments

Presenter: Alex Coppock, Alissa Stollwerk, Trish Kirkland, Dane Thorley

Install R packages:

  • arm, list

Readings:

  • Glynn, Adam N. 2013. “What can we learn with statistical truth serum? Design and analysis of the list experiment.” Public Opinion Quarterly. 77; 159-172.
  • Blair, Graeme and Kosuke Imai. 2012. “Statistical Analysis of List Experiments.” Political Analysis. 20: 47-77.

Intro to Sensitivity Analysis

Presenters: Alex Coppock, Albert Fang

Install R packages:

  • rbounds

Selected Readings:

Note: first three papers are short.

  • Imbens, Guido. 2003. “Sensitivity to Exogeneity Assumptions in Program Evaluation.” The American Economic Review. [download from CU Libraries]
  • Rosenbaum, Paul R. and Donald B. Rubin. 1983. “Assessing Sensitivity to an Unobserved Binary Covariate in an Observational Study with Binary Outcome.” JRSS, Series B. 45(2): 212-218. [download from CU Libraries]
  • Rosenbaum, Paul R. 2005. “Sensitivity Analysis in Observational Studies.” in Everitt, Brian S. and David C. Howell, eds. Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science. Vol 4. pp. 1809-1814. [paper]
  • Harada, Masataka. 2013. “Generalized Sensitivity Analysis and Application to Quasi-Experiments.” Working Paper: New York University. [paper] [Stata ado files]

Other useful references:

  • Rosenbaum, Paul R. 2010. Design of Observational Studies. Springer-Verlag.
  • Rosenbaum, Paul R. 2002. Observational Studies. Springer.

Web Scraping in R and Python

Presenters: Andy Guess, Sung Eun Kim

Install:

  • R packages: RCurl and XML
  • Python and relevant packages: See installation instructions handout [pdf]

Readings:

  • None

Survey Experiments

Presenters: Sarah Khan, Dane Thorley, Lauren Young

Install:

  • R package: endorse (implements the statistical model proposed by Bullock, Imai & Shapiro 2011 to analyze endorsement experiments)

Key Readings:

  • Jason Barabas and Jennifer Jerit. Are survey experiments externally valid? American Political Science Review, 104(2), May 2010. [paper]
  • Jens Hainmueller, Daniel J. Hopkins, Teppei Yamamoto. 2013. “Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices Via Stated Preference Experiments.” MIT Political Science Department Research Paper No. 2013-4. [paper]
  • Brian J. Gaines, James H. Kuklinski, and Paul J. Quirk. The logic of the survey experiment reexamined. Political Analysis, 15:1-20, 2007. [paper]
  • Diana C. Mutz. Population-Based Survey Experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.

Key Applied Papers:

  • Will Bullock, Kosuke Imai, and Jake Shapiro. Statistical analysis of endorsement experiments: Measuring support for militant groups in pakistan. Political Analysis, 19(4):363{384, 2011. [paper] [replication data]
  • Jason Lyall, Graeme Blair, and Kosuke Imai. Explaining support for combatants during wartime: A survey experiment in Afghanistan. American Political Science Review, forthcoming. [paper] [replication data]
  • Graeme Blair, C. Christine Fair, Neil Malhotra, and Jake Shapiro. Poverty and support for militant politics: Evidence from pakistan. American Journal of Political Science, 57(1):30-48, 2013. [paper] [replication data]
  • James M. Glaser and Timothy J. Ryan. Changing Minds, If Not Hearts. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013. Herbert H. Hyman and Paul B. Sheatsley. The current status of american public opinion. In The teaching of contemporary affairs. 1950.
  • Ilyana Kuziemko, Michael I. Norton, Emmanuel Saez, and Stefanie Stantcheva. How elastic are preferences for redistribution? evidence from randomized survey experiments. NBER Working Paper, (18865), March 2013.
  • Evan Lieberman, Daniel Posner, and Lily Tsai. Does information lead to more active citizenship? Evidence from an education intervention in rural Kenya. 2013.
  • Michael Tomz and Jessica Weeks. An experimental investigation of the democratic peace.

Regression Discontinuity

Presenters: Albert Fang, Gabriella Sacramone-Lutz

Install:

  • R packages: rdd, AER, lmtest

Selected Background Papers:

  • Lee, David S. and Thomas Lemieux. 2010. “Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature. 48: 281-355. [pdf; gated - access via CU Libraries]
  • Imbens, Guido and Karthik Kalyanaraman. 2012. “Optimal Bandwidth Choice for the Regression Discontinuity Estimator.” Review of Economic Studies. doi:10.1093/restud/rdr043 [pdf] [replication files]
  • McCrary, Justin. 2008. “Manipulation of the Running Variable in the Regression Discontinuity Design: A Density Test.” Journal of Econometrics. 142(2). [pdf] [replication files]

Selected Applied Papers:

  • Caughey, Devin and Jasjeet S. Sekhon. 2011. “Elections and the Regression Discontinuity Design: Lessons from Close U.S. House Races, 1942-2008.” Political Analysis. 19:385-408. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr032 [pdf]
  • Eggers, Andrew C., Olle Folke, Anthony Fowler, Jens Hainmueller, Andrew B. Hall, James M. Snyder, Jr. 2013. “On the Validity of the Regression Discontinuity Design for Estimating Electoral Effects: New Evidence from Over 40,000 Close Races.” Working Paper. [pdf]
  • Erikson, Robert S. and Rocio Titiunik. 2013. “Using Regression Discontinuity to Uncover the Personal Incumbency Advantage.” Working Paper. [pdf]